An Entirely Innocent Question About Artificial Intelligence

Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia was talking a couple of weeks ago about Anthropic’s artificial intelligence “Mythos model.”  Warner said, “This tool broke into almost all of our classified systems, not in weeks but in hours.”

Hmmm.

An artificial intelligence system can break into almost all of the United States’ classified systems in hours.

That sounds pretty dangerous.

Am I permitted to ask a follow-up question?

How does the Mythos model do when you ask it to focus on the North Korean, Iranian, Russian, or Chinese classified systems?

From the sound of things, you could give some spook a couple of days with the Mythos model and all of North Korea’s nukes would be disabled. The Middle East wouldn’t have to worry about Iranian ballistic missiles, because none of them would fly.

Right?

Am I missing something?

I mean, if the problem is that our computer doesn’t speak Persian, that could surely be solved.

Maybe the computer doesn’t speak Persian now.

But slightly adjust the large language model, and the computer does speak Persian … now.

Are the systems the U.S. government uses to protect its classified documents so inferior to the systems used by other countries that Mythos can crack our systems, but not theirs?

If so, shame on us.

But just juice the AI somehow, and set it to work.

Think about it: We don’t have to worry about the Russian nuclear arsenal, because we’ve set AI to work disabling it. We don’t have to worry about the Chinese stealing our intellectual property, because all of the thieving software has been disabled. In fact, maybe we could start stealing Chinese IP for building electric vehicles, and solar panels, and robotics, and the like.

Shoot! Maybe AI could figure out how to make the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool blue again.

I’m just a silly clown at a keyboard, typing away out here in the cheap seats.

But if I’ve had this thought — if AI can crack our computers, can’t it crack theirs? — haven’t at least a few people in the U.S. government had the same thought?

Have those people put the thought into action?

Maybe the United States is again a hegemon. All of the other countries have been infiltrated; their systems won’t work; and they don’t know it yet.

Or maybe Sen. Mark Warner has slightly misstated things.

Heck if I know.

Ask ChatGPT.


Mark Herrmann spent 17 years as a partner at a leading international law firm and later oversaw litigation, compliance and employment matters at a large international company. He is the author of The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law and Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy (affiliate links). You can reach him by email at inhouse@abovethelaw.com.

The post An Entirely Innocent Question About Artificial Intelligence appeared first on Above the Law.



from Above the Law https://ift.tt/4hx9G5N
via IFTTT

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post